spacer graphic spacer
Register    Login    Search    Help    About
graphic
Home Agenda Discussions Panelists Participants Library Guidelines

NOTE: Please login to participate. Logging in allows you to access all functions and to see what's new since your last visit.

FOCUS POINT: NCLB Public School Choice Requirements

COMMENT: enforce through coercion and punishment??


Submitted by mark spyder thompson, ph.d. on 10/12/04 2:32 PM

Since the only possible actual mechanism of applied enforcement is money, then this tact again targets only those schools that are impoverished. Several intelligent school districts discovered that they could reject Title One revenues and free themselves from the burdens of all sorts of Federal and State regulation. These of course were for the most part wealthy. The supposition being, at least from all the posts I have read so far on all three threads is that rich schools don't fail.

Well, at least on test scores maybe. They certainly seem to be failing miserably at moral and ethical values if the tenor and tone of these discussions are any indication. In a sense this reminds me of the abortion debate. Any laws passed to restrict or eliminate a woman's rights over her own body apply solely to the unwealthy. Those with the economic means and power can do whatsoever they wish; free from the encumberance of law. We must keep in mind that ESEA II was written by neo-con Straussians, for whom the power generated by the accumulation of great wealth is the sole determinate of value as a being. By this standard, most of the population of the US are failures (in many cases in their own eyes as well) and almost all of the public schools are failing tragically.


COMMENT THREAD

NCLB Public School Choice Requirements

Submitted by Todd Ziebarth on 10/12/04 05:37 AM



Home | Dialogue Agenda | Discussions | Panelists | Participants | Library | Guidelines

Web Dialogues are produced by WestEd Interactive.